In 2007, Graeme Smith had the opportunity to have Sourav Ganguly "timed out", but he chose not to enforce this rule 🫡🫡
TIME OUT INCIDENT IN THE YEAR 2007...Was it taken???
In the world of cricket, sportsmanship and fair play are highly regarded, and instances like the one you mentioned involving Graeme Smith and Sourav Ganguly reflect the spirit of the game.
In the world of cricket, sportsmanship and fair play are highly regarded, and instances like the one you mentioned involving Graeme Smith and Sourav Ganguly reflect the spirit of the game.
Facts about incident.
The incident you're referring to took place in 2007 during a Test match between South Africa and India. Sourav Ganguly, a legendary Indian cricketer, was at the crease, and Graeme Smith, the South African captain, had the chance to "time out" Ganguly but chose not to do so.
The term "timed out" in cricket refers to a mode of dismissal where a batsman is declared out because they took too much time to get ready and face the next delivery. This is a rare form of dismissal and is largely dependent on the sportsmanship and fairness of the fielding side.
In this specific incident, Graeme Smith's decision not to appeal for a "timed out" dismissal speaks volumes about the mutual respect and sportsmanship that exists among cricketers. It demonstrates a deep understanding of the unwritten rules and gentlemanly conduct that are integral to the sport of cricket.
Graeme Smith, as the captain of the South African team, had a choice to make. He could have appealed to the umpire, claiming that Ganguly was taking an excessive amount of time to prepare to face the next delivery. This would have put Ganguly in a difficult position, possibly leading to his dismissal under the "timed out" rule. However, Smith chose not to do so.
By not appealing for Ganguly's dismissal, Graeme Smith showed tremendous sportsmanship. He likely recognized that the delay caused by Ganguly was unintentional or due to legitimate reasons. Instead of exploiting a technicality in the rules to gain an advantage, Smith decided to uphold the values of fairness and respect that are integral to the game of cricket.
Sportsmanship and fairness
This incident also highlights the importance of the captain's role as a leader on the field. A captain's decisions and actions set the tone for their team's conduct, and Smith's decision not to appeal for the "timed out" dismissal showcased his leadership and commitment to the spirit of the game.
Cricket is not just a sport; it is a tradition steeped in values and ethics that extend beyond the boundary. The incident involving Graeme Smith and Sourav Ganguly is a testament to the enduring spirit of cricket, where respect for opponents and adherence to sportsmanship are held in high regard.
In conclusion, Graeme Smith's decision not to enforce the "timed out" rule against Sourav Ganguly in 2007 exemplifies the sportsmanship, fair play, and respect that are at the heart of cricket. It serves as a reminder of the unwritten rules and the code of conduct that cricketers adhere to, making the sport not only a contest of skill but also a celebration of values and traditions.
Thank you for reading my blogs.would be happy for any feedback on article,so that can make my presence felt among others friends on blogger.com
The term "timed out" in cricket refers to a mode of dismissal where a batsman is declared out because they took too much time to get ready and face the next delivery. This is a rare form of dismissal and is largely dependent on the sportsmanship and fairness of the fielding side.
In this specific incident, Graeme Smith's decision not to appeal for a "timed out" dismissal speaks volumes about the mutual respect and sportsmanship that exists among cricketers. It demonstrates a deep understanding of the unwritten rules and gentlemanly conduct that are integral to the sport of cricket.
Graeme Smith, as the captain of the South African team, had a choice to make. He could have appealed to the umpire, claiming that Ganguly was taking an excessive amount of time to prepare to face the next delivery. This would have put Ganguly in a difficult position, possibly leading to his dismissal under the "timed out" rule. However, Smith chose not to do so.
By not appealing for Ganguly's dismissal, Graeme Smith showed tremendous sportsmanship. He likely recognized that the delay caused by Ganguly was unintentional or due to legitimate reasons. Instead of exploiting a technicality in the rules to gain an advantage, Smith decided to uphold the values of fairness and respect that are integral to the game of cricket.
Sportsmanship and fairness
This incident also highlights the importance of the captain's role as a leader on the field. A captain's decisions and actions set the tone for their team's conduct, and Smith's decision not to appeal for the "timed out" dismissal showcased his leadership and commitment to the spirit of the game.
Cricket is not just a sport; it is a tradition steeped in values and ethics that extend beyond the boundary. The incident involving Graeme Smith and Sourav Ganguly is a testament to the enduring spirit of cricket, where respect for opponents and adherence to sportsmanship are held in high regard.
In conclusion, Graeme Smith's decision not to enforce the "timed out" rule against Sourav Ganguly in 2007 exemplifies the sportsmanship, fair play, and respect that are at the heart of cricket. It serves as a reminder of the unwritten rules and the code of conduct that cricketers adhere to, making the sport not only a contest of skill but also a celebration of values and traditions.
Thank you for reading my blogs.would be happy for any feedback on article,so that can make my presence felt among others friends on blogger.com
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment